When Wicked Part One arrived in theaters, it carried the weight of nearly two decades of expectation on its shoulders. The Broadway musical had long been considered untouchable, beloved by fans across generations and cultures, and the idea of translating its emotional scale, visual magic, and political subtext to the screen felt like an impossible task. Against all odds, the first film managed not only to meet expectations but to ignite global conversation, dominate social media, and introduce the story of Elphaba and Glinda to an entirely new audience. By the time Wicked: For Good entered the cultural conversation, it was no longer simply a sequel. It was a reckoning, a finale, and a test of whether modern Hollywood could successfully conclude a story rooted in fantasy while grappling with themes of power, identity, propaganda, and moral compromise.
From the moment the first trailers for Wicked: For Good were released, it became clear that this was not going to be a lighthearted continuation. The tone was darker, more emotionally charged, and far more politically resonant than many mainstream musicals dare to be. Set against a visually richer and more oppressive version of Oz, the film promised to explore the consequences of the choices made in the first chapter, not just for its two central characters but for an entire society built on illusion, fear, and selective storytelling.
Wicked: For Good picks up immediately after the events that fractured the friendship between Elphaba and Glinda, with Oz now firmly under the control of the Wizard’s regime and public opinion turning decisively against the so called Wicked Witch of the West. The film leans heavily into the idea that history is written by those in power, and that truth often becomes the first casualty of political convenience. Elphaba is no longer simply misunderstood. She is actively hunted, her image distorted through posters, public announcements, and carefully orchestrated spectacles designed to inspire fear.
What sets the film apart is its refusal to paint its characters in simple moral tones. Elphaba’s resistance is portrayed as necessary but isolating, heroic but deeply painful. Her growing anger, grief, and disillusionment are not romanticized. Instead, the film allows her to be flawed, impulsive, and emotionally exhausted. Cynthia Erivo’s performance anchors the entire narrative, delivering a portrayal that feels raw, intimate, and increasingly internalized. Where the first film allowed Elphaba moments of explosive defiance, Wicked: For Good often finds her in quiet despair, forced to confront the reality that doing the right thing does not always lead to victory or recognition.
Glinda’s arc is equally complex and arguably more controversial. Now firmly positioned as a public figure and symbol of goodness, she is trapped within the very system she once benefited from. Ariana Grande portrays Glinda with a careful balance of charm and growing unease, showing how privilege can become a prison when it demands silence in exchange for safety. Her scenes are filled with subtle tension, especially when she must perform happiness for the public while privately reckoning with guilt, fear, and the knowledge that her comfort comes at the cost of Elphaba’s suffering.
The emotional climax of Wicked: For Good is not built around spectacle but around choice. Rather than delivering a simple battle between good and evil, the film focuses on the personal cost of resistance and compliance. The final act explores whether reconciliation is possible in a world that thrives on division and whether love and friendship can survive when history demands a villain.
Visually, Wicked: For Good expands the world of Oz in striking and often unsettling ways. Director Jon M. Chu leans into darker color palettes, using shadow, smoke, and architectural oppression to reflect the tightening grip of authoritarian control. Emerald City, once vibrant and theatrical, becomes colder and more rigid, its beauty masking a growing sense of surveillance and manipulation. This visual transformation mirrors the film’s themes, reinforcing the idea that aesthetics can be used as tools of control.
The cinematography emphasizes scale without losing intimacy. Wide shots of public rallies and ceremonies are contrasted with close, almost claustrophobic framing during private moments of doubt and confrontation. The film frequently uses reflections, windows, and barriers as visual metaphors, highlighting how characters are constantly separated from their true selves by expectation and fear.
Costume design also plays a significant role in the storytelling. Glinda’s wardrobe becomes increasingly structured and ceremonial, symbolizing her transformation from carefree student to controlled symbol. Elphaba’s appearance, meanwhile, grows more utilitarian and stripped back, emphasizing survival over presentation. These visual choices subtly reinforce the emotional journeys of both characters without relying on explicit exposition.
One of the most anticipated aspects of Wicked: For Good was how it would handle the musical’s most emotionally devastating songs. Rather than simply recreating stage versions, the film adapts each number to the cinematic medium with care and restraint. Songs are often integrated into the narrative in ways that feel organic rather than performative, allowing emotion to drive the music rather than spectacle.
Cynthia Erivo delivers a particularly haunting performance in the film’s most pivotal musical moments, using silence and restraint as effectively as vocal power. Her interpretation of Elphaba’s internal conflict resonates deeply, transforming familiar lyrics into something newly intimate and heartbreaking. Ariana Grande, meanwhile, uses Glinda’s musical numbers to reveal cracks beneath the character’s polished exterior, her voice often carrying a sense of forced optimism that gradually gives way to vulnerability.
The decision to allow certain moments to remain quiet, resisting the urge to fill every emotional beat with music, adds to the film’s maturity. When songs do arrive, they feel earned, emerging from character rather than obligation.
Fan response to Wicked: For Good has been intense, emotional, and deeply divided in some areas. Longtime fans of the Broadway musical largely praised the film for its willingness to embrace the story’s darker themes and emotional complexity, applauding the performances and the decision to avoid simplifying the narrative for mass appeal. Many took to social media to express how deeply the film resonated, particularly in its portrayal of propaganda, scapegoating, and the personal cost of speaking out.
At the same time, some fans struggled with the film’s heavier tone and ambiguous resolution. For viewers expecting a more traditional sense of closure or redemption, the ending felt challenging and, for some, frustrating. Discussions around Glinda’s choices became a major point of debate, with audiences divided over whether her actions represented understandable survival or moral failure. These conversations, however, only reinforced the film’s cultural relevance, turning Wicked: For Good into a subject of ongoing discourse rather than a fleeting blockbuster.
Younger audiences, many of whom were introduced to the story through the films rather than the stage musical, responded strongly to the film’s political undertones. Online discussions frequently drew parallels between Oz’s manipulation of public perception and real world media narratives, misinformation, and the consequences of performative goodness.
Critics largely praised Wicked: For Good for its ambition and emotional intelligence, with many highlighting it as a rare example of a blockbuster that trusts its audience to engage with complexity. Reviews often focused on the strength of the performances, particularly Cynthia Erivo’s portrayal of Elphaba, which several critics described as career defining. Ariana Grande’s performance also received recognition for subverting expectations, proving her ability to handle dramatic material with nuance and restraint.
Some criticism was directed at the film’s pacing, particularly in its middle section, where the emphasis on internal conflict over external action led to a slower narrative rhythm. Others noted that the film’s refusal to offer clear moral resolutions might alienate viewers accustomed to more conventional storytelling. Despite these critiques, the overall critical consensus acknowledged the film’s artistic integrity and cultural significance.
Within the industry, Wicked: For Good has been widely discussed as a turning point for movie musicals, demonstrating that the genre can engage with serious themes without sacrificing mainstream appeal. Awards conversations quickly followed, particularly around acting, production design, and original score, solidifying the film’s place as more than just a commercial success.
No film of this scale escapes controversy, and Wicked: For Good was no exception. Some viewers criticized the film for being overly political, arguing that its themes of propaganda and systemic injustice felt too explicit. Others countered that these elements had always been present in the source material and that the film simply refused to soften them for comfort.
There were also debates around casting and adaptation choices, particularly among purists who felt certain moments deviated too far from the stage version. These discussions, while occasionally heated, underscored the passion surrounding the story and its characters.
Rather than diminishing the film’s impact, these controversies kept it at the center of cultural conversation for weeks after its release, reinforcing its relevance and longevity.
Ultimately, Wicked: For Good stands as an emotionally resonant conclusion to a story that has always been about perspective, power, and the cost of truth. It refuses easy answers, embraces moral ambiguity, and challenges its audience to reflect on their own role in shaping narratives, both personal and political.
By prioritizing character over spectacle and emotion over resolution, the film cements Wicked as more than a fantasy musical. It becomes a modern myth, one that speaks directly to the complexities of contemporary life while honoring the emotional core that made it beloved in the first place.
In doing so, Wicked: For Good does not simply conclude a story. It invites its audience to reconsider what it means to be good, what it means to be wicked, and who ultimately gets to decide the difference.
Leave a Reply